Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ulises Blanch vs Pablo Cuevas Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Blanch vs Cuevas analysis and find out who is favored!
Ulises Blanch vs Pablo Cuevas Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Blanch 1 - 0 Cuevas
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Blanch has won 47.03% of points on his second serve, while Cuevas has won 15%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Blanch, in recent form, has won 55.2% of his opponent's second serve points, while Cuevas has won 33.33%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.66% and 16% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Blanch has saved 67.01% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cuevas has saved 64.29% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Blanch has won 62.86% of matches played (W/L 22/ 13), with Cuevas winning 33.33% (W/L 3/ 6) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Blanch has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 86/ 80). Cuevas has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 466/ 260), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 10/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Blanch has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 15/ 10), where as Cuevas has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 40% of matches (W/L 2/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Blanch winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Blanch winning 2 and Cuevas winning 1. The last match between Blanch and Cuevas was at the Campinas Challenger, 02-10-2018, First, Clay with Ulises Blanch getting the victory 6-4 6-7(4) 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:13:7.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Blanch and Cuevas have played a deciding set 1 times, with Blanch winning 1 times and Cuevas 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Blanch winning 0, and Cuevas 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Blanch has played against opponents with an average rank of 217.51 while Cuevas has played against players with an average rank of 266.56.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Blanch has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cuevas has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Blanch has converted 37.86% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cuevas has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
528
Rank
236
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
830
Rank
19
High
38
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
53% (212-187)
Career Total W/L
60% (570-383)
77% (10-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-1)
$54,150
Career Prize Money
$4,615,038
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ulises Blanch | Pablo Cuevas |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 18 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 11 | 10 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:13:7 | 2:13:7 |
| 1st Serve % | 51% (50/99) | 46% (51/110) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 80% (40/50) | 82% (42/51) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 61% (30/49) | 51% (30/59) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 23% (3/13) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 35% (38/110) | 29% (29/99) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-7(4) 6-4 |
Stats 
Ulises Blanch
Player
Pablo Cuevas
51%
(
50 of
99)
1st Serve %
46%
(
51 of
110)
11
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
6
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
42 of
51)
61%
(
30 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
29 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
38 of
110)
108
Total Points Won
101
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ulises Blanch | Pablo Cuevas |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 77% (10/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (20/11) | 0% (0/2) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (156/139) | 8% (1/12) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 77% (10/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.64 | 0.5 |
| Aces Total | 92 | 3 |
| DFs per game | 0.44 | 0.17 |
| DFs Total | 63 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:47 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 195 | 253 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (562/949) | 60% (30/50) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (415/562) | 60% (18/30) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (182/387) | 15% (3/20) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (39/103) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (378/956) | 22% (8/37) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 78% (7/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 77% (10/13) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (9/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (9/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (4/1) | 0% (1/0) |
Ulises Blanch Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ramkumar Ramanathan
Player
Ulises Blanch
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Saba Purtseladze
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
12
Aces
18
6
Double Faults
2
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
40 of
50)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
27 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
25 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Ben Jones
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
11
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
20%
(
10 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Giorgi Giorgadze
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
94%
(
17 of
18)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Ulises Blanch
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
86)
12
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
3
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
37 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Robert Strombachs
58%
(
76 of
130)
1st Serve %
76%
(
79 of
104)
15
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
6
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
55 of
79)
54%
(
29 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
38%
(
50 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
104)
119
Total Points Won
115
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Matej Dodig
59%
(
50 of
85)
1st Serve %
49%
(
34 of
70)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
88%
(
30 of
34)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
45%
(
38 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
81
|
0-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Luca Castagnola
52%
(
51 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
68 of
108)
7
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
45%
(
21 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
106
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Louis Dussin
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Pablo Cuevas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Giulio Zeppieri
Player
Pablo Cuevas
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Pablo Cuevas
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hugo Gaston
Player
Pablo Cuevas
44%
(
32 of
72)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
63%
(
25 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pablo Cuevas
Player
Gauthier Onclin
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
85%
(
17 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Diaz Acosta
Player
Pablo Cuevas
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
73%
(
40 of
55)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pablo Cuevas
Player
Stefano Travaglia
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
64 of
111)
4
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
16%
(
3 of
19)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
111)
99
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Felipe Meligeni Alves
Player
Pablo Cuevas
72%
(
56 of
78)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
4
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
42 of
54)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
27%
(
21 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
24 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pablo Cuevas
Player
Egor Gerasimov
63%
(
74 of
118)
1st Serve %
66%
(
78 of
119)
7
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
2
82%
(
61 of
74)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
58 of
78)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
33 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
39 of
119)
124
Total Points Won
113
|
6-4 6-7(8) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefano Napolitano
Player
Pablo Cuevas
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Pablo Cuevas
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Blanch Vs Cuevas Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
